| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches |
| Date: | 2016-01-29 13:17:30 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob6BqOTjvxLjfJmdNQOZB-qHxYoZVUu=C=ZTt+cVXeUaw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Alexander Korotkov
<a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:
>> So far as I can tell, there are three patches in flight here:
>>
>> * replication slot IO lwlocks
>> * ability of extensions to request tranches dynamically
>> * PGPROC
>>
>> The first one hasn't been reviewed at all, but the other two have seen a
>> bit of discussion and evolution. Is anyone doing any more reviewing?
>
> I'd like to add another one: fixed tranche id for each SLRU.
+1 for this. The patch looks good and I will commit it if nobody objects.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2016-01-29 13:25:07 | Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-01-29 13:15:36 | Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches |