Re: Dimension limit in contrib/cube (dump/restore hazard?)

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Dimension limit in contrib/cube (dump/restore hazard?)
Date: 2018-08-31 22:10:04
Message-ID: CAPpHfdsRr_uCUzhJeeWp4mQBxKjxBkF1o6BUC4m7cC-YCK5K+A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 6:18 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2018-Aug-30, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>
> > Personally I get tired with cube.out
> > and cube_2.out. They are different with only few checks involving
> > scientific notation. But all the patches touching cube regression
> > tests should update both cube.out and cube_2.out. I propose to split
> > scientific notation checks into separate test.
>
> Good idea.

Thank you for the feedback! Pushed.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-08-31 22:13:31 Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes
Previous Message Jean-Pierre Pelletier 2018-08-31 20:56:30 Re: psql \dC incorrectly shows casts "with inout" as "binary coercible" on 9.5.14 and 11beta3