Re: Mark btree_gist functions as PARALLEL SAFE

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: "Winfield, Steven" <Steven(dot)Winfield(at)gam(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Mark btree_gist functions as PARALLEL SAFE
Date: 2020-07-20 12:38:32
Message-ID: CAPpHfds0DqvOMZJW0raFgXe0p9xmxPwa8EBeHoZ=b1K02e=g5g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 3:18 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 03:26:24PM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:48 PM Winfield, Steven
> > <Steven(dot)Winfield(at)gam(dot)com> wrote:
> > > Done - thanks again.
> >
> > This patch looks good to me.
> >
> > I'm going to push this if no objections.
>
> I marked as committed to make patch checker look healthier.
>

Thank you!

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2020-07-20 13:15:52 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Previous Message David Steele 2020-07-20 12:21:46 Re: max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments