Re: Mark btree_gist functions as PARALLEL SAFE

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Winfield, Steven" <Steven(dot)Winfield(at)gam(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Mark btree_gist functions as PARALLEL SAFE
Date: 2020-07-20 12:18:51
Message-ID: 20200720121851.GA5748@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 03:26:24PM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:48 PM Winfield, Steven
> <Steven(dot)Winfield(at)gam(dot)com> wrote:
> > Done - thanks again.
>
> This patch looks good to me.
>
> I'm going to push this if no objections.

I marked as committed to make patch checker look healthier.

Thanks,
--
Justin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2020-07-20 12:21:46 Re: max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2020-07-20 12:03:26 Re: Partitioning and postgres_fdw optimisations for multi-tenancy