| From: | Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "movead(dot)li" <movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes. |
| Date: | 2021-03-01 08:56:10 |
| Message-ID: | CAPmGK17kzTxbS=Av_HN3kKgeWTrt9Kwz5eO_UtKN1nDYLru=6Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 3:35 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> So I’ll update the patch using your patch without the
> postgresIterateForeignScan() change.
Here is an updated version of the patch. Based on your idea of
completing an in-progress command (if any) before sending a new
command to the remote, I created a function for that
process_pending_request(), and added it where needed in
contrib/postgres_fdw. I also adjusted the patch, and fixed some bugs
in the postgres_fdw part of the patch.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| async-wip-2021-03-01.patch | application/octet-stream | 91.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-03-01 09:08:45 | Re: repeated decoding of prepared transactions |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2021-03-01 08:39:13 | Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers |