| From: | Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | "Andrey V(dot) Lepikhov" <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Defer selection of asynchronous subplans until the executor initialization stage |
| Date: | 2022-03-13 09:39:02 |
| Message-ID: | CAPmGK17XPqcZ19eKS09KXshBRZmWxitjs_RZTj8bjCVOQfBHnQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Alexander,
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 3:40 PM Alexander Pyhalov
<a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Etsuro Fujita писал 2021-08-30 12:52:
> > To allow async execution in a bit more cases, I modified the patch a
> > bit further: a ProjectionPath put directly above an async-capable
> > ForeignPath would also be considered async-capable as ForeignScan can
> > project and no separate Result is needed in that case, so I modified
> > mark_async_capable_plan() as such, and added test cases to the
> > postgres_fdw regression test. Attached is an updated version of the
> > patch.
> The patch looks good to me and seems to work as expected.
Thanks for reviewing! I’m planning to commit the patch.
Sorry for the long delay.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yura Sokolov | 2022-03-13 10:24:51 | Re: BufferAlloc: don't take two simultaneous locks |
| Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2022-03-13 09:28:23 | Re: postgres_fdw: commit remote (sub)transactions in parallel during pre-commit |