Re: postgres_fdw: commit remote (sub)transactions in parallel during pre-commit

From: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw: commit remote (sub)transactions in parallel during pre-commit
Date: 2022-02-21 05:55:07
Message-ID: CAPmGK16m4ZPp4Gux2tF-nkXSbyv-Apie1xCT7AGBS1FzwHXLmA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 6:55 AM David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca> wrote:
> Tried to apply the patches to master branch, no warning found and
> regression test passed.

Thanks for testing!

> Now, we have many places (5) calling the same function with a constant
> number 30000. Is this a good time to consider redefine this number a
> macro somewhere?

Yeah, I think that is a good idea. I’ll do so in the next version of
the parallel-abort patch (#0003) if no objections.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2022-02-21 05:55:43 Re: Optionally automatically disable logical replication subscriptions on error
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2022-02-21 05:52:18 Re: Separate the result of \watch for each query execution (psql)