| From: | Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, 798604270(at)qq(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Amit Langote <amitlan(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #19484: Segmentation fault triggered by FDW |
| Date: | 2026-06-18 10:50:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAPmGK16fALJqbyR1Oir7-TsN8k_yAR-JcOg5nWOUmDmivTmDtA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Amit-san,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 6:16 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> A small clarification on this one: the patch makes no changes to
> postgres_fdw code, only adds a regression test. The bug, which I
> introduced, is in how nodeModifyTable.c supplies fdw_private from the
> pruned/validated fdwPrivLists in ModifyTableState rather than the
> original list in ModifyTable, so the postgres_fdw side itself is
> unchanged. The substantive change is the executor re-indexing.
Thanks for the clarification!
> Still holding off on committing per our exchange, but no rush given
> you may want to prioritize the v19 open items. Happy to go ahead
> whenever, or wait for your comments.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2026-06-18 10:55:05 | Re: BUG #19484: Segmentation fault triggered by FDW |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2026-06-18 09:15:44 | Re: BUG #19484: Segmentation fault triggered by FDW |