| From: | Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Asynchronous MergeAppend |
| Date: | 2026-04-06 05:32:55 |
| Message-ID: | CAPmGK16c_hsMz1RM9Wu7F44cQzL+oOdC_T1S0nteAYG0hwTrxQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 6, 2026 at 12:40 PM Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2026 at 11:25 AM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I'm going to went through this patchset another time tomorrow and push
> > it on Monday if there are no objections.
>
> I completely understand the desire to get this committed ahead of the
> feature freeze. However, I'm concerned that a one-day notice over the
> Easter weekend is simply too short for the community to see the
> announcement, let alone provide feedback, especially since this is a
> pretty big feature.
>
> I don't have any specific technical feedback on the patchset itself,
> as I haven't reviewed it. My only hesitation is the short notice
> period. That said, if you are highly confident in its readiness, I
> will defer to your judgment.
First, my apologies for not having reviewed this patch. I was
planning to do so, but didn't have time for that, due to other
priorities.
I hate to say this, but as mentioned by Richard, this is a pretty big,
complex feature, so I also think the one-day notice is too short.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2026-04-06 05:47:43 | Re: index prefetching |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2026-04-06 05:24:23 | Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently] |