Hi Amit-san,
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:34 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think there's a word missing in the following comment:
>
> /*
> * See if the partition bounds for inputs are exactly the same, in
> * which case we don't need to work hard: the join rel have the same
> * partition bounds as inputs, and the partitions with the same
> * cardinal positions form the pairs.
>
> ": the join rel have the same..." seems to be missing a "will".
>
> Attached a patch to fix.
Good catch! Will fix.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita