Re: Test case for parameterized remote path in postgres_fdw

From: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Test case for parameterized remote path in postgres_fdw
Date: 2023-08-30 08:50:57
Message-ID: CAPmGK15+ezWEg8t==AhaZTik06vCRoV26Y-RQ0M0ouZ-Svd0VA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 6:45 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 9:41 AM Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 7:50 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> So we should have modified the second one as well? Attached is a
> >> small patch for that.
>
> > Agreed, nice catch! +1 to the patch.
>
> Thanks for looking!

Pushed.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-08-30 08:57:10 Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-08-30 07:33:41 Re: New WAL record to detect the checkpoint redo location