| From: | Christian Convey <christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Breaking compile-time dependency cycles of Postgres subdirs? |
| Date: | 2014-02-10 15:37:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAPfS4Zykb-HzUS2Lcm3V5WB2xT3C0oZuhKx9pser7E0Th=XOzA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I think if it had been a clear, enforced goal all along, it might've been
> possible to build the system with such a restriction (for the most part at
> least). At this point though, the amount of work and code churn involved
> seems like it'd far exceed the benefits.
>
>
That makes sense to me. I certainly didn't think it was a slam-dunk that
what I was proposing would be an improvement. It just seemed like a
question worth asking. Thanks for your thoughts.
- Christian
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-02-10 16:11:28 | Re: Memory ordering issue in LWLockRelease, WakeupWaiters, WALInsertSlotRelease |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-02-10 15:28:40 | Re: Breaking compile-time dependency cycles of Postgres subdirs? |