Re: Tackling JsonPath support

From: Christian Convey <christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Tackling JsonPath support
Date: 2016-12-03 02:04:24
Message-ID: CAPfS4ZycJ52VJ+Q4Tidzz0zxDfQi4zOg4RgV8zTWpM2ng9CpXA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com> wrote:
...
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 08:53:33AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:

> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Christian Convey
> > <christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > I think I can satisfy (3) with a PG extension which provides a
> function that
> > > approximately implements JSONPath. My short-term plans are to submit
> such a
> > > patch.
> >
> > FWIW, I think that's a fine plan. I don't really know whether
> > JSONPath is the right standard to pick for the task of extracting bits
>
> It's not even a standard. Are there particular proposals that the ANSI
> SQL working group is considering?
>

​Hi Nico, it seems to be something in the works with the standards
committee. We were discussing it earlier in the thread: [1]

Kind regards,
Christian

[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org/msg297732.html​

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-12-03 02:15:01 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add max_parallel_workers GUC.
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2016-12-03 01:28:01 Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in _hash_splitbucket_guts