Re: Question about Lockhart's book

From: Christian Convey <christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Question about Lockhart's book
Date: 2013-12-27 16:14:17
Message-ID: CAPfS4ZyRAUgS8C21AQSLDhCjAu+oDNAHDwJKphZXsS64ZJcvgA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Andrew,

Thanks for your response. Sometimes overall software architectures stay
(mostly) unchanged for a long time, and so I figured that's possibly the
case for Postgresql as well. But I didn't know, which is why I asked.

Kind regards,
Christian

On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>wrote:

>
> On 12/27/2013 10:55 AM, Christian Convey wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I'm starting to poke around the internals of Postgres. Does anyone know
>> the extent to which Thomas Lockhart's book, "PostgresSQL Programmer's
>> Guide" is accurate with respect to the current state of the code base?
>>
>>
>>
> Umm, that book was published in 2000, from what I can see on Amazon. Would
> you use a book published 13 years ago to educate yourself on, say, the
> Linux code base? 13 years is an eternity in this business.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2013-12-27 16:43:13 Re: Happy new year from viva64
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-12-27 16:11:44 Re: Question about Lockhart's book