| From: | Philip Alger <paalger0(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Jonathan Gonzalez V(dot)" <jonathan(dot)abdiel(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Add pg_get_publication_ddl function |
| Date: | 2026-06-11 02:11:09 |
| Message-ID: | CAPXBC8+XaiLvQa5jHDoHL6D8CoDdEPKNMYfizytKF-hTZJzcuQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > >
> > > 3.
> > > It would be better if the the rows of "Table 9.96" were in
> alphabetical order.
> >
> > I think that this should be done in a different patch when all or a big
> > part of the functions are merged.
> >
>
> FYI, I've created another thread [1] to address those things above,
>
> ======
> [1]
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut+Pun9Z8qZFJTa9fLgdhM=Cip9d-cnx2YXDW6eFrSwbQj1g@mail.gmail.com
>
>
It's a good idea, but the author of this patch should either fix it or you
should propose your patch after this one is committed. Otherwise, you're
going to make the author create another version based on a fix you already
suggested for the current patch.
--
Best,
Phil Alger
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | torikoshia | 2026-06-11 02:27:20 | Re: Why is the LSN reported for pg_logical_emit_message() different from other decoded operations? |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2026-06-11 02:01:22 | Re: Add pg_get_publication_ddl function |