Re: timescaledb vs NULL vs pg_timeseries vs partman + pgcron + pg_ivm

From: Amitabh Kant <amitabhkant(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Achilleas Mantzios - cloud <a(dot)mantzios(at)cloud(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: timescaledb vs NULL vs pg_timeseries vs partman + pgcron + pg_ivm
Date: 2025-04-10 05:25:19
Message-ID: CAPTAQBKzj7O_tjy+dAju1i6GMcxMV_kg+HBgY0DiE64ajYD6tQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:50 AM Achilleas Mantzios - cloud <
a(dot)mantzios(at)cloud(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> wrote:

>
> On 4/9/25 04:50, Amitabh Kant wrote:
>
> Thank you, I meant the paid/supported service not the community version.
>> Which of the two do you use?
>>
>>
>> I use the community version.
>
>
> On 4/9/25 05:23, Brent Wood wrote:
>
> I also use the free community edition on internal servers, but under
> Ubuntu. No issues and very good performance.
>
> Brent Wood...
>
>
> Thanks Amitabh abd Brent, how do you plan to cope with future upgrades
> based on logical replication ? Do you run timescale on a dedicated/separate
> system from the rest of your PostgreSQL cluster(s)?
>

I don't use the inbuilt logical replication. I depend upon pgBackRest for
my backups. My database is mainly time series data, and runs on the same
systems.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Olleg Samoylov 2025-04-10 05:33:02 Re: Interesting case of IMMUTABLE significantly hurting performance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-04-09 22:08:08 Re: Interesting case of IMMUTABLE significantly hurting performance