Re: Streaming replication connection break - unexpected EOF on standby connection

Hi,

Finally issue has been resolved and issue was with network. There were
two issues as below.

1. We have two links between primary and secondary, VPN tunnel and
L2TP. Multiple routes
were configured for VPN and L2TP from the Secondary to
primary. Tunnel and link was always up. But, ss the source from Secondary
is coming through tunnel towards Primary the connection was getting
dropped after reaching the destination due to ambiguity on routes
between L2TP and VPN tunnel. This issue has been resolved by allowing
access via VPN tunnel removing L2TP route.

2. After fixing the above, still disconnection was happening, but after
specific time interval. It was due to certain negotiation time set IPSEC
tunnel.
So they have enabled auto negotiation on the IPSEC tunnel so it won’t wait
from tunnel initiation from other end.

So issues related disconnection has been resolved.

Thanks Johannes and Fabio for your help.

Regards,
Ganesh.

On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 5:37 PM Fabio Pardi <f(dot)pardi(at)portavita(dot)eu> wrote:

> Hi Ganesh,
>
> the logs you posted refer to timeouts in the connections.
>
> Your configuration tells that in case of network drop, the standby server
> will be the first to acknowledge it. That's because wal_receiver_timeout is
> < than wal_sender_timeout
>
> From the documentation:
> wal_receiver_timeout (integer)
>
> Terminate replication connections that are inactive longer than the
> specified number of milliseconds. This is useful for the receiving standby
> server to detect a primary node crash or network outage. A value of zero
> disables the timeout mechanism. This parameter can only be set in the
> postgresql.conf file or on the server command line. The default value is
> 60 seconds.
>
> That might explain why your secondary server calls for a RST.
>
> RST packages you posted are more a consequence, than a cause of your
> problem.
>
> I think that the RST is sent to acknowledge master that the connection
> should be closed due to timeout.
>
> What above goes together with the fact that the sequence number 1232664740
> of the RST packet is retransmitted several times, meaning that it did not
> reach its destination at first.
>
> I would look more carefully to your network because I suspect the real
> problem might be there.
>
>
> regards,
>
> fabio pardi
>
>
>
>
> On 03/07/18 09:36, Ganesh Korde wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> After analysis by network team, they found packets are getting reset
> by Secondary server. Below are the logs.
>
> 782.822280 port7 in <Secondary_server_IP>.35918 ->
> <Primary_server_IP>.5433: rst 1232664740
>
> 782.822310 wan2 out <Secondary_server_IP>.35918 ->
> <Primary_server_IP>.5433: rst 1232664740
>
> 782.822313 port7 in <Secondary_server_IP>.35918 ->
> <Primary_server_IP>.5433: rst 1232664740
>
> 782.822315 wan2 out <Secondary_server_IP>.35918 ->
> <Primary_server_IP>.5433: rst 1232664740
>
> 782.822317 port7 in <Secondary_server_IP>.35918 ->
> <Primary_server_IP>.5433: rst 1232664740
>
> 782.822319 wan2 out <Secondary_server_IP>.35918 ->
> <Primary_server_IP>.5433: rst 1232664740
>
> 782.822345 port7 in <Secondary_server_IP>.35918 ->
> <Primary_server_IP>.5433: rst 1232664740
>
> But they didn't able to find why secondary generating reset packet. There
> are no any devices between these servers which can modify the packets.
> Though both servers are on different firewall, but packets are getting
> reset at secondary server and not at the firewall level, we can see this in
> the log.
>
> Below points I would like to mention about application
> 1. This connection interruption happens in day time, when transactions are
> little bit high. In day time, average transactions per second are 5
> (Inserts and processing).
> 2. We are not using connection pool, so each time request comes app server
> creates new connection to db server and when processing is done, app server
> disconnects.
>
> We are now clue less why secondary server resetting the packets. Any help
> is highly appreciated.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Ganesh.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 3:38 PM Ganesh Korde <ganeshakorde(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Johannes,
>>
>> Thanks for your reply. We are using VPN Tunnel between these two hosts.
>> I will check with network team, with remaining questions you mentioned and
>> will get back.
>>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Ganesh.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 6:46 PM Johannes Truschnigg <
>> johannes(at)truschnigg(dot)info> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ganesh,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 06:37:25PM +0530, Ganesh Korde wrote:
>>> > [...]
>>> > 1. Because of what reason, " unexpected EOF on standby connection"
>>> occurs
>>> > on primary db server?
>>> > 2. After replication disconnection, secondary should immediately
>>> connect to
>>> > primary, but it takes some time, what could be the reason for this?
>>>
>>> From skimming the log, it seems to me that there is an issue at the
>>> socket/network level, which yields the "connection reset by peer" eror
>>> message.
>>>
>>> What is the network between these two hosts like? Is it a WAN link; is a
>>> VPN
>>> or SSH tunnel involved? Do you have other, long-running TCP sessions
>>> between
>>> these peers, and do they experience similar or other problems? Do the
>>> hosts'
>>> link-layer stats hint at problems, e. g. packet loss? Do the hosts'
>>> kernels
>>> leave a message hinting at L2 connectivity problems in their debug
>>> ringbuffers
>>> (`dmesg`) at the time you observe the replication drop out?
>>>
>>> --
>>> with best regards:
>>> - Johannes Truschnigg ( johannes(at)truschnigg(dot)info )
>>>
>>> www: https://johannes.truschnigg.info/
>>> phone: +43 650 2 133337
>>> xmpp: johannes(at)truschnigg(dot)info
>>>
>>> Please do not bother me with HTML-email or attachments. Thank you.
>>>
>>
>