Re: inconsistent behavior with "GENERATED BY DEFAULT AS IDENTITY"

From: Himanshu Upadhyaya <upadhyaya(dot)himanshu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: inconsistent behavior with "GENERATED BY DEFAULT AS IDENTITY"
Date: 2021-08-29 16:11:59
Message-ID: CAPF61jCDjzrT_pFw4R1Lc9jVRmYhoGjPqGUmUCcMKBYMdHAoew@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

ok, understood.

Thanks Tom.

Regards,
Himanshu

On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 7:10 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Himanshu Upadhyaya <upadhyaya(dot)himanshu(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > IMHO below query should replace "NULL" value for ID column with the
> > GENERATED IDENTITY value (should insert 1,10 for ID and ID1 respectively
> in
> > below's example), similar to what we expect when we have DEFAULT
> constraint
> > on the column.
>
> Why? Ordinary DEFAULT clauses do not act that way; if you specify NULL
> (or any other value) that is what you get. If you want the default
> value, you can omit the column, or write DEFAULT.
>
> > Any reason for disallowing NULL insertion?
>
> Consistency and standards compliance.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-08-29 16:47:38 Re: Spelling change in LLVM 14 API
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-08-29 16:11:09 Re: Spelling change in LLVM 14 API