From: | Leonardo Carneiro <chesterman86(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: upgrading from V8.3.4 to V9.2.4 |
Date: | 2013-04-05 16:37:47 |
Message-ID: | CAP5xjbv6OfZkE319MDPF-wea=r92Hj_wy3-oYkhnkYgme75MOw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Beside all notes, i recommend you to use pg_upgrade, to avoid a complete
backup/restore in your transition.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/pgupgrade.html
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> wrote:
> Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, there were also some subtle breakage around keywords used
> > as variable naming when plpgsql was port to use the core lexer.
>
> One more: from a Java client access to bytea columns will break if
> you don't also use the latest JDBC driver jar.
>
> --
> Kevin Grittner
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-04-05 16:52:15 | Re: Bug or feature? (The constraint of the domain of extension can be dropped...) |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-04-05 16:30:06 | Re: upgrading from V8.3.4 to V9.2.4 |