From: | Leonardo Carneiro <chesterman86(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: check_postgres monitor by Bucardo - any opinions? |
Date: | 2011-10-20 23:08:16 |
Message-ID: | CAP5xjbu3JLZ_H-pTcgxC8oRu7fUXy80Kc1JNt4zBf1GYQYnbsw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Here too! it just works. Maybe you'll want to check pgwatch [1] as well.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Jan Lentfer <Jan(dot)Lentfer(at)web(dot)de> wrote:
> Am 20.10.2011 22:10, schrieb Scott Marlowe:
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Mark Steben
>> <mark(dot)steben(at)autorevenue(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> I'm evaluating the check_postgres program. We are running postgres 8.3.
>>> Does anybody have any experience with this monitoring software they would
>>> like to share? I'm specifically interested in the 'postgres_bloat'
>>> program
>>> but
>>> would welcome any comments about anything germaine to check_postgres.
>>>
>> I use it, it works fine, lots of development. Note that bloat
>> checking is only as accurate as your last analyze.
>>
>> Same here, work great imho.
>
> --
> professional: http://www.oscar-consult.de
> private: http://neslonek.homeunix.org/**drupal/<http://neslonek.homeunix.org/drupal/>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/**mailpref/pgsql-admin<http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vladimir Rusinov | 2011-10-21 08:13:45 | Re: check_postgres monitor by Bucardo - any opinions? |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2011-10-20 20:31:26 | Re: check_postgres monitor by Bucardo - any opinions? |