| From: | Shinya Kato <shinya11(dot)kato(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Enhance statistics reset functions to return reset timestamp |
| Date: | 2025-10-27 03:36:15 |
| Message-ID: | CAOzEurTH9g9oirw7U8s4DrqKdr29D0z70QjSawY_F8EJ0-dgkw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 3:31 PM Shinya Kato <shinya11(dot)kato(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 4:06 PM Shinya Kato <shinya11(dot)kato(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 9, 2025 at 7:37 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 2025-08-08 13:18:39 +0900, Shinya Kato wrote:
> > > > I would like to propose a series of patches that enhance the behavior
> > > > of various statistics reset functions by making them return the reset
> > > > timestamp. This change improves usability and aligns with the behavior
> > > > introduced in commit dc9f8a798[1], where pg_stat_statements_reset()
> > > > was updated to return the reset time.
> > > >
> > > > The following functions have been modified to return a TIMESTAMP WITH
> > > > TIME ZONE value indicating when the statistics were reset:
> > > > - pg_stat_reset()
> > > > - pg_stat_reset_shared()
> > > > - pg_stat_reset_single_table_counters()
> > > > - pg_stat_reset_backend_stats()
> > > > - pg_stat_reset_single_function_counters()
> > > > - pg_stat_reset_slru()
> > > > - pg_stat_reset_replication_slot()
> > > > - pg_stat_reset_subscription_stats()
> > > > - pg_stat_clear_snapshot()
> > >
> > > -1 - I think it was a mistake to introduce support for granular resets, we
> > > shouldn't bury ourselves deeper. If anything we should rip out everything
> > > other than 1) a global reset b) a per-database reset.
> > >
> > > Leaving that aside, I just don't see a convincing use case for returning the
> > > timestamp here.
> >
> > As I mentioned earlier, the use case is to obtain an audit trail of
> > the statistics reset time from the function’s return value.
> >
> > Also, how should we think about consistency with
> > pg_stat_statements_reset()? The reset timestamp for pg_stat_statements
> > can be obtained from the pg_stat_statements_info view, which returns a
> > TIMESTAMPTZ. Of course, pg_stat_statements is a contrib module, so we
> > don’t necessarily have to match its behavior. However, when running a
> > script that resets various statistics before tests, if only
> > pg_stat_statements_reset() returns a TIMESTAMPTZ, it might look as
> > though the other statistics reset functions failed.
> >
> > What these patches do is simply return the TIMESTAMPTZ that is already
> > computed for the pg_stat_* views, which seems to me a reasonable
> > change.
>
> Rebased the patches.
Rebased the patches.
--
Best regards,
Shinya Kato
NTT OSS Center
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0001-Make-pg_stat_reset-return-the-reset-time.patch | application/octet-stream | 7.4 KB |
| v3-0002-Make-pg_stat_reset_shared-return-the-reset-time.patch | application/octet-stream | 14.5 KB |
| v3-0003-Make-pg_stat_reset_single_table_counters-return-t.patch | application/octet-stream | 7.2 KB |
| v3-0004-Make-pg_stat_reset_backend_stats-return-the-reset.patch | application/octet-stream | 4.8 KB |
| v3-0005-Make-pg_stat_reset_single_function_counters-retur.patch | application/octet-stream | 6.0 KB |
| v3-0006-Make-pg_stat_reset_slru-return-the-reset-time.patch | application/octet-stream | 7.3 KB |
| v3-0007-Make-pg_stat_reset_replication_slot-return-the-re.patch | application/octet-stream | 9.0 KB |
| v3-0008-Make-pg_stat_reset_subscription_stats-return-the-.patch | application/octet-stream | 6.1 KB |
| v3-0009-Make-pg_stat_clear_snapshot-return-the-reset-time.patch | application/octet-stream | 8.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chao Li | 2025-10-27 03:50:21 | Re: remove obsolete comment in AtEOXact_Inval |
| Previous Message | Chao Li | 2025-10-27 03:33:11 | Re: Use BumpContext contexts for TupleHashTables' tablecxt |