| From: | Shinya Kato <shinya11(dot)kato(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, maciek(at)sakrejda(dot)org, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add mode column to pg_stat_progress_vacuum |
| Date: | 2025-12-05 04:29:54 |
| Message-ID: | CAOzEurQT9dd59au+EbXN_huX8NLYoEPZJiUxyODdUKGstViJ0Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thank you for the review!
On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 9:15 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've attached a small change to simplify the 0001 patch. Please review it.
LGTM, and I've updated in v9 patches.
> Here are a few comments:
>
> + <listitem>
> + <para>
> + <literal>manual</literal>: The analyze was started by an explicit
>
> For consistency with "started_by" in pg_stat_progress_vacuum, I think
> it's better to start with "The operation was started by".
I think "started_by" in pg_stat_progress_vacuum uses "The vacuum was
started by ...".
> ---
> + <command>ANALYZE</command> or <command>VACUUM (ANALYZE)</command>
> + command.
>
> How about using "... or VACUUM with the ANALYZE option"?
Agreed, I've fixed it.
--
Best regards,
Shinya Kato
NTT OSS Center
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v9-0001-Add-mode-and-started_by-columns-to-pg_stat_progre.patch | application/octet-stream | 11.2 KB |
| v9-0002-Add-started_by-column-to-pg_stat_progress_analyze.patch | application/octet-stream | 5.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-12-05 04:36:56 | Re: Improve error reporting in 027_stream_regress test |
| Previous Message | shveta malik | 2025-12-05 03:58:58 | Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart |