Re: Link missing in the 14 release notes

Greetings,

On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 21:57 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 09:47:47PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 21:35 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > I normally link to only the _first_ mention of something, and since
> they
> > are both in the same section, I didn't add a link for the second one.
> > Adding a second link might suggest that there is more information
> > available, even though the coarseness of our links means that
> section is
> > the same.
> >
> > Perhaps the wording would be better as something like:
> >
> > New <a href=“…”>predefined roles</a> for granting access to read/write
> all
> > tables have been added, called pg_read_all_data and pg_write_all_data ..?
> >
> > Or something along those lines?
>
> I have avoided doing that since the link is about the roles, not about
> the term "predefined roles".

I tend to agree that it’s about the roles, but it isn’t about just one of
them …

> Just a thought.
> >
> > Perhaps another idea would be to make one link which includes both names.
>
> Uh, that is going to look odd, I am afraid.

This thread started with the point that the current entry looks odd. I’m
not sure this would look more odd than what is there now.

Thanks,

Stephen

>