| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Role Self-Administration |
| Date: | 2021-10-05 17:20:16 |
| Message-ID: | CAOuzzgos2eo37REiy9oztt7hM_sua=vkbiPh2tK6PXqnrHG1gA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings,
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 13:17 Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
wrote:
> > On Oct 5, 2021, at 10:14 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> >
> > What does the “ownership” concept actually buy us then?
>
> DROP ... CASCADE
I’m not convinced that we need to invent the concept of ownership in order
to find a sensible way to make this work- though it would be helpful to
first get everyone’s idea of just what *would* this command do if run on a
role who “owns” or has “admin rights” of another role?
Thanks,
Stephen
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-10-05 17:22:53 | Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2021-10-05 17:19:22 | Re: A problem about partitionwise join |