Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)

From: Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Lukas Fittl <lukas(at)fittl(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Date: 2022-12-08 05:09:18
Message-ID: CAOtHd0DUMzNMG8Sprd0hXM_WOUerpeUy8s-rXoePWHxUnfWmtw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

In the pg_stat_statements docs, there are several column descriptions like

Total number of ... by the statement

You added an additional sentence to some describing the equivalent
pg_stat_io values, but you only added a period to the previous
sentence for shared_blks_read (for other columns, the additional
description just follows directly). These should be consistent.

Otherwise, the docs look good to me.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message torikoshia 2022-12-08 05:10:32 Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2022-12-08 05:07:54 Re: add \dpS to psql