Re: GetNewObjectId question

From: Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GetNewObjectId question
Date: 2022-12-11 07:03:38
Message-ID: CAOtHd0B06YVWA32DxZ8-Ri5J6Ho64udGRGpMoF4evzgc31DcsA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Sure. My C is pretty limited, but I think it's just the attached? I
patterned the usage on the way this is done in CreateRole. It passes
check-world here.

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Replace-GetNewObjectId-call-with-GetNewOidWithIndex.patch text/x-patch 1.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-12-11 07:20:17 Re: GetNewObjectId question
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2022-12-11 06:33:34 Re: Progress report of CREATE INDEX for nested partitioned tables