| From: | Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sadeq Dousti <msdousti(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Christophe Courtois <christophe(dot)courtois(at)dalibo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Possible regression in PG18 beta1 |
| Date: | 2025-05-17 17:29:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAOtHd0Axiu_9P_E=swD3aFP5wA5TA5wjWPKC=khePcZEgBpq7A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 9:38 AM Sadeq Dousti <msdousti(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> So, one mystery solved (no planner regression), still three questions:
> * Somewhat slower execution in PG18
> * Planner differences in TEMP vs. UNLOGGED
> * Actual rows with decimal (1.00) vs. integer (1)
>
Regarding the last one, I believe that's intentional, due to a change to
EXPLAIN output [1]. No comment on the others.
Thanks,
Maciek
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-05-17 17:29:57 | Re: Possible regression in PG18 beta1 |
| Previous Message | Sadeq Dousti | 2025-05-17 16:38:03 | Re: Possible regression in PG18 beta1 |