From: | Zenaan Harkness <zen(at)freedbms(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: advocating LTS release and feature-train release cycles |
Date: | 2015-06-02 05:16:53 |
Message-ID: | CAOsGNSQDTTO8Y8PSqGpG52s6USwi8z23AzEDiAgug_tyEBFKiw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 6/2/15, Jan de Visser <jan(at)de-visser(dot)net> wrote:
> On June 1, 2015 11:11:37 PM Arthur Silva wrote:
>> In my opinion a twice a year schedule would be good.
>> The LTS would be every 2 or 4 releases. Keeping 2 LTS versions supported
>> at
>> all moments.
>>
>> Maybe this should be reposted to the hackers list?
>
> Pretty sure this would be shot down pretty quick. At this point it seems
> more
> likely to me that the time between releases will be longer rather than
> shorter.
Really, that sounds like an excellent way to test such an alternative
- if pg development went to what every other major libre project does,
we would not have a proper comparison of the outcome for the
alternative (lengthening the release cycle, rather than shortening).
I know how I think it'll pan out - but personal opions matter little
here, only what the dev's choose.
Whatever the outcome, this will be a great experiment in the long run,
providing a data point we would be quite unlikely to have otherwise!
Regards,
Zenaan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Noah Misch | 2015-06-02 05:21:21 | Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
Previous Message | Fabio Ugo Venchiarutti | 2015-06-02 04:40:15 | Minor revision downgrade (9.2.11 -> 9.2.10) |