Re: advocating LTS release and feature-train release cycles

From: Zenaan Harkness <zen(at)freedbms(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: advocating LTS release and feature-train release cycles
Date: 2015-06-02 05:16:53
Message-ID: CAOsGNSQDTTO8Y8PSqGpG52s6USwi8z23AzEDiAgug_tyEBFKiw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 6/2/15, Jan de Visser <jan(at)de-visser(dot)net> wrote:
> On June 1, 2015 11:11:37 PM Arthur Silva wrote:
>> In my opinion a twice a year schedule would be good.
>> The LTS would be every 2 or 4 releases. Keeping 2 LTS versions supported
>> at
>> all moments.
>>
>> Maybe this should be reposted to the hackers list?
>
> Pretty sure this would be shot down pretty quick. At this point it seems
> more
> likely to me that the time between releases will be longer rather than
> shorter.

Really, that sounds like an excellent way to test such an alternative
- if pg development went to what every other major libre project does,
we would not have a proper comparison of the outcome for the
alternative (lengthening the release cycle, rather than shortening).

I know how I think it'll pan out - but personal opions matter little
here, only what the dev's choose.

Whatever the outcome, this will be a great experiment in the long run,
providing a data point we would be quite unlikely to have otherwise!

Regards,
Zenaan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2015-06-02 05:21:21 Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Previous Message Fabio Ugo Venchiarutti 2015-06-02 04:40:15 Minor revision downgrade (9.2.11 -> 9.2.10)