| From: | Karen Jex <karenhjex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Karen Jex <karenjex(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Good beginner doc-hacking task: clear-text vs. cleartext vs. clear text vs. plaintext etc.. |
| Date: | 2026-11-06 19:16:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAOpR_fZWjuS5aqoSvzYh5h+y7L4MoT4zX7=Rnys-gnn1omwyBA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Le ven. 6 nov. 2026 à 15:49, David E. Wheeler <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> a écrit :
>
> > Just to confirm my understanding:
> > 1. We should use "cleartext" and "plaintext" throughout, not "clear-text", "clear text", "plain text" or "plain-text".
> > 2. There is at least one case where "plaintext" is used incorrectly in place of "cleartext”.
>
> I thought these were synonyms, in contrast to “ciphertext”. Should we not pick one to replace all of the others? Searching around a bit, it seems like “ciphertext” and “plaintext” are most often contrasting terms, e.g., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ciphertext.
I think you're right, and that makes the task much simpler (that was
my initial understanding, before I found various articles suggesting
that cleartext and plaintext were not the same). I see that the
cleartext Wikipedia entry redirects to plaintext:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plaintext, which implies that plaintext
may be the preferred term.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matemática A3K | 2026-11-07 00:28:39 | Re: [Minor] Possible missing syntax |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2026-11-06 14:49:02 | Re: Good beginner doc-hacking task: clear-text vs. cleartext vs. clear text vs. plaintext etc.. |