Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq

From: Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, "Prabakaran, Vaishnavi" <VaishnaviP(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Manuel Kniep <m(dot)kniep(at)web(dot)de>, "fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp" <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Iwata, Aya" <iwata(dot)aya(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Date: 2017-06-20 00:09:37
Message-ID: CAOoUkxTrka=dsAdKjmt2TsJdX0tRW5Vmebr5PtOR9RJb5VFbyQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> On 2017-04-05 15:45:26 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2017-04-05 17:00:42 +1000, Vaishnavi Prabakaran wrote:
> > > Regarding test patch, I have corrected the test suite after David
> Steele's
> > > comments.
> > > Also, I would like to mention that a companion patch was submitted by
> David
> > > Steele up-thread.
> > >
> > > Attached the latest code and test patch.
> >
> > My impression is that this'll need a couple more rounds of review. Given
> > that this'll establish API we'll pretty much ever going to be able to
> > change/remove, I think it'd be a bad idea to rush this into v10.
> > Therefore I propose moving this to the next CF.
>
> Craig, Vaishnavi, everyone else: Are you planning to continue to work on
> this for v11? I'm willing to do another round, but only if it's
> worthwhile.
>

Yes, am willing to continue working on this patch for v11.

>
> FWIW, I still think this needs a pgbench or similar example integration,
> so we can actually properly measure the benefits.
>

I will investigate on this further.

Thanks & Regards,
Vaishnavi,
Fujitsu Australia.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergey Burladyan 2017-06-20 00:50:29 Re: Broken hint bits (freeze)
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2017-06-19 23:33:31 Re: REPLICA IDENTITY FULL