Re: let's kill AtSubStart_Notify

From: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: let's kill AtSubStart_Notify
Date: 2019-09-27 09:43:25
Message-ID: CAOgcT0M=M2VA=Uz+Rt=LTwaNLddZK5Uu-DnXbas65LaBKoudHQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> I did not read the patch but run the same case what you have given and
> I can see the similar improvement with the patch.
> With the patch 8832.988, without the patch 10252.701ms (median of three
> reading)
>

Possibly you had debug symbols enabled? With debug symbols enabled
I also get about similar number 10136.839 with patch vs 12900.044 ms
without the patch.

Regards,
Jeevan Ladhe

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeevan Ladhe 2019-09-27 09:49:40 Re: let's kill AtSubStart_Notify
Previous Message Alexandra Wang 2019-09-27 09:42:35 Re: Zedstore - compressed in-core columnar storage