Re: Postgres 9.6 Logical and Fisical replication

From: Mario Fernando Guerrero Díaz <guedim(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres 9.6 Logical and Fisical replication
Date: 2017-10-05 14:31:06
Message-ID: CAOfUdgfZFNnt2czE+GSEBFFXMtgin1+_GJ0zO8mDCj1vNak0TQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thank you for the clarification.

El 5/10/2017 9:27 AM, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> escribió:

> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:30 PM, guedim <guedim(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I am working with Postgres9.6 with a Master/Slave cluster replication
> using
> > Streaming replication.
> > I would like to add a new Slave server database but this database with
> > logical replication .
> >
> > I tried with some configurations but it was not possible :(
> >
> > https://github.com/guedim/postgres-streaming-replication
> >
> > Here is the image of what is in my mind:
> > <http://www.postgresql-archive.org/file/t350419/Database_Replication.png
> >
>
> This question is really off-topic for this list, which is probably why
> you haven't gotten any replies. This list is for discussion of
> PostgreSQL development; there are other lists for user questions, like
> pgsql-general. Logical replication is only supported beginning in
> PostgreSQL 10; if you are using some earlier version, you need an
> add-on tool like pglogical, slony, etc.
>
> Please also read https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Guide_to_reporting_
> problems
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-10-05 14:45:52 Re: Proposal: Improve bitmap costing for lossy pages
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-10-05 14:27:32 Re: Postgres 9.6 Logical and Fisical replication