Re: future of PQfn()

On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 9:11 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm certainly open to other ideas, but I'm afraid this is the best I've
> come up with in my admittedly limited time thinking about the problem.

No worries -- I hadn't meant to block progress here on protocol
design. I think keeping PQnfn() for the immediate future is a good
plan. I just wanted to plant a seed for getting away from this problem
eventually.

(As for pie-in-the-sky alternative ideas, the ability for middleware
to separate contexts or streams of packets has come up before. libpq
could theoretically mark its own "context" of server-side allocations
that are not touched by an application-context DISCARD.)

--Jacob