Re: Custom oauth validator options

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>
Cc: VASUKI M <vasukianand0119(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, myon(at)debian(dot)org
Subject: Re: Custom oauth validator options
Date: 2025-12-18 18:43:01
Message-ID: CAOYmi+nbCrvcE9wLQdNCgMwDbbi_UzGYrzfC54txmMBJ9KxO=Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 10:28 AM Zsolt Parragi
<zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com> wrote:
> But without requiring
> shared_preload_libraries, we can't do early error reporting during
> postmaster startup about custom parameters. Is that okay?

I think I need to do more staring at the intersection of GUC
registration and session_preload_libraries, because my memory of the
order of operations was faulty. I won't be able to do that before the
holidays, most likely.

--Jacob

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2025-12-18 19:07:00 Re: Recovering from detoast-related catcache invalidations
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2025-12-18 18:35:31 Re: [PATCH] Add memory usage reporting to VACUUM VERBOSE