Re: libpq: Process buffered SSL read bytes to support records >8kB on async API

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Lars Kanis <lars(at)greiz-reinsdorf(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: libpq: Process buffered SSL read bytes to support records >8kB on async API
Date: 2025-07-18 19:09:03
Message-ID: CAOYmi+nMWsFda6peKJFT1TUMSUSd1vHPKUyemPWweO6Gi=TXKg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 11:11 AM Jacob Champion
<jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> The current behavior for GSS is, IMO, an
> obvious oversight.

(A better way to word this would have been "clearly an oversight"; I
didn't mean to imply that the correct behavior is obvious. The
opposite, in fact.)

--Jacob

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2025-07-18 19:17:02 Re: Test instability when pg_dump orders by OID
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2025-07-18 18:50:46 Re: index prefetching