Re: Support getrandom() for pg_strong_random() source

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Support getrandom() for pg_strong_random() source
Date: 2025-10-15 16:03:14
Message-ID: CAOYmi+nCOiuGuJz-EOrwh-+hvb-UeKPdgt8Y83QsOSws_9ofwA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 2:49 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think the second item fits better with the current thread's subject.
> Having said that, these two items are somewhat related (for example,
> adding getrandom() support would be a common change for both), so
> perhaps we can start with the pg_strong_random() changes in this
> thread?

Sounds good.

--Jacob

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2025-10-15 16:20:03 Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart
Previous Message Srirama Kucherlapati 2025-10-15 15:58:58 RE: AIX support