Re: [oauth] Bug: when is shutdown_cb called?

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [oauth] Bug: when is shutdown_cb called?
Date: 2026-05-29 21:50:56
Message-ID: CAOYmi+miRhnYCog1f_OGy2_Np7y9b-j9U7HaLSYq7zDrVtfKNA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 5:04 PM Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Feb 28, 2026, at 00:55, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > I propose the attached diff, with a backport to 18.

This is now pushed.

> “Server backend” sounds a bit uncommon in the documentation.

I suppose. We also say things like "PostgreSQL backend", "bootstrap
backend", and of course just "server" and "backend". I don't think
this is likely to cause any confusion, so I've kept it, but I can
always patch+backpatch again if others feel strongly.

Thanks!
--Jacob

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2026-05-29 21:54:39 Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Previous Message Álvaro Herrera 2026-05-29 21:41:42 Re: [PATCH] Fix segmentation fault caused by reentrancy in RI_Fkey_cascade_del (ri_triggers.c)