| From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? |
| Date: | 2024-04-03 14:04:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAOYmi+mXbMVhHNm-GAzQaEopfsquqm1-wvCA73k4xnxa2Ln6yA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 11:55 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> The attached removes 1.0.2 support (meson build parts untested yet) with a few
> small touch ups of related documentation. I haven't yet done the research on
> where that leaves LibreSSL since we don't really define anywhere what we
> support (so for we've gotten by assuming it's kind of sort 1.0.2 for the parts
> we care about which is skating on fairly thin ice).
As far as I can tell, no versions of LibreSSL so far provide
X509_get_signature_info(), so this patch is probably a bit too
aggressive.
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2024-04-03 14:10:08 | Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2024-04-03 13:40:29 | Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions |