Re: pg16 && GSSAPI && Heimdal/Macos

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Todd M(dot) Kover" <kovert(at)omniscient(dot)com>, Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg16 && GSSAPI && Heimdal/Macos
Date: 2025-05-28 16:25:08
Message-ID: CAOYmi+mTpY0=rdof0OnSfZKwHtn3Ct+aW9RXvHSrYFqp4r4kQQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 8:53 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Even granting that we're okay with letting people build against
> Heimdal, I'm not clear on the path forward. Your patch proposes
> to effectively disable gss_accept_delegation, which isn't real
> palatable (and would require docs and test fixes that aren't there).
> Nico seemed to think that there is a way to perform delegation
> without using gss_store_cred_into; if we could avoid that loss of
> functionality, it'd go a long way towards making the idea more
> acceptable. I also wonder about whether we ought to try to use
> GSS.framework on Mac.

Personally, I'd be more happy to "maintain GSS on Mac using
non-deprecated interfaces" than "maintain GSS via Heimdal,
best-effort, some of the time". I think the former puts less of a
burden on our testing matrix.

--Jacob

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2025-05-28 16:34:22 Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-05-28 15:53:09 Re: pg16 && GSSAPI && Heimdal/Macos