| From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: PSA: Planning to grease protocol connections during 19beta |
| Date: | 2026-05-05 21:27:21 |
| Message-ID: | CAOYmi+mQYjjhNjnzMqNwXirYrA8hzh_1YUrySJ9YLOOuR-KyzQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 11:58 AM Jacob Champion
<jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Something I'm struggling with is whether (and how) to have people let
> us know when they've hit this, so that we know that the campaign is
> working. I have some language to that effect in the "What do I need to
> do?" section, but I don't really know what list I should point to, if
> any, nor what they should say so that they don't confuse the list
> regulars. I'm considering removing that part of the call to action.
I have removed this.
Are there any opinions on whether [1] in its current state is an
improvement over [2] as a landing page for users who hit this? I would
only swap out the link if I can get the wiki page protected.
Thanks,
--Jacob
[1] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Grease
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/libpq-connect.html#LIBPQ-CONNECT-MAX-PROTOCOL-VERSION
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2026-05-05 21:36:02 | Re: [BUG] CRASH: ECPGprepared_statement() and ECPGdeallocate_all() when connection is NULL |
| Previous Message | Zsolt Parragi | 2026-05-05 21:16:24 | Re: Inconsistent trigger behavior between two temporal leftovers |