| From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Updating IPC::Run in CI? |
| Date: | 2025-09-18 19:24:46 |
| Message-ID: | CAOYmi+m5bSgVDROB1KEL3MRaCsdVwA5YvU6CvqYR2B9QH9H90Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 12:16 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I don't think there's a hard and fast rule, but I do think that it's a
> reasonably important goal to make sure that the OS/distro actually can build
> packages - and as part of that test those packages - reasonably well. So
> requiring wildly different things than what is available on $platform to run
> the tests reliably is bad.
I agree with that in general, but if a buildfarm operator reports
running into a already-fixed IPC::Run bug on an older distribution,
presumably we're going to tell them to install a newer IPC::Run,
right?
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2025-09-18 19:25:08 | Re: PG 18 relnotes and RC1 |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-09-18 19:20:29 | fix obsolete references to postgres.h in comments |