Re: [oauth] Stabilize the libpq-oauth ABI (and allow alternative implementations?)

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>
Cc: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jonathan Gonzalez V(dot)" <jonathan(dot)abdiel(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [oauth] Stabilize the libpq-oauth ABI (and allow alternative implementations?)
Date: 2026-03-31 18:51:14
Message-ID: CAOYmi+m2GLpGUFH3c-j79Y3Y0QNRiUWOb2P1W5_JJ6B1sAPB8g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 11:33 PM Zsolt Parragi
<zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com> wrote:
> Shouldn't this return PostgresPollingStatusType, and declare ret using it?

Yes, thanks. Done in 0af4d402c.

--Jacob

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2026-03-31 18:51:41 Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2026-03-31 18:50:02 Re: [oauth] Stabilize the libpq-oauth ABI (and allow alternative implementations?)