| From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Improve code coverage of network address functions |
| Date: | 2025-01-20 21:39:40 |
| Message-ID: | CAOYmi+kx8eOmKj01dV4vSBeq9pvqR8dt6rGw+B_pBOE2_GOj+g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 12:27 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Part of my thought here is that these functions are not worth their
> very own TAP test, with all the overhead that implies of firing up
> a new database instance. So I was looking for something we could
> fold them into.
By themselves, yeah, probably not. Having a separate place for a
TCP-focused suite might decrease the activation energy for testing
other network features, though.
In any case, Aleksander, I don't mean to sign you up for all that; the
`ssl` suite also seems good enough to me if you're interested in
pursuing that side of the patch further.
Thanks!
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Corey Huinker | 2025-01-20 21:45:00 | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2025-01-20 21:39:35 | Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0 |