| From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Filip Janus <fjanus(at)redhat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Subject: | Re: Channel binding for post-quantum cryptography |
| Date: | 2025-10-31 20:57:36 |
| Message-ID: | CAOYmi+khx0=unNhquZyKCCg6AMmnaqvyOZ7V2w0ps0VrONnN+A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 2:26 AM Filip Janus <fjanus(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
> While fixing the actual issue will take some time, I’ve fixed the requested test.
> Since I’m still quite new to the PG community, would it make sense to propose a patch that only adds the test?
You mean like in a TODO: block in the test? Maybe, but in my opinion
the damage to configure alone is not worth the benefit for this case,
until the test is passing. (And if OpenSSL were to change to provide a
digest through its API, as briefly mentioned in the IETF discussion,
the new test might not actually test any new code.)
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Jones | 2025-10-31 21:00:51 | Re: display hot standby state in psql prompt |
| Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2025-10-31 20:30:52 | Re: Support getrandom() for pg_strong_random() source |