Re: [oauth] Stabilize the libpq-oauth ABI (and allow alternative implementations?)

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [oauth] Stabilize the libpq-oauth ABI (and allow alternative implementations?)
Date: 2026-03-07 00:24:38
Message-ID: CAOYmi+kXWfL8HjjetwMaXrGVNn2JLEjy3Vbe-1F0fbb2nXPjEA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 4:57 PM Jacob Champion
<jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> v6-0001 through -0003 are targeted for commit next.

v6-0001 is pushed, after making another docs/comments/commit message
pass, and adding one last test to pin the correct meaning of
PGoauthBearerRequestV2.issuer for future maintainers. I'm working on
some of Zsolt's feedback before posting a new set.

--Jacob

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matt Blewitt 2026-03-07 00:26:53 Re: [PATCH] Fix PITR pause bypass when initial XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS has subxid overflow
Previous Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2026-03-07 00:17:42 Re: Change copyObject() to use typeof_unqual