Re: [PATCH] Fix OAuth feature detection on OpenBSD+Meson

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix OAuth feature detection on OpenBSD+Meson
Date: 2025-06-24 20:39:49
Message-ID: CAOYmi+kExTM6vqOXbrjz9hcC4riAwCSuZBFSfWgQnBggSJT=cw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 1:29 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> Note that Autoconf uses a compilation test, not a preprocessor test, for
> its AC_CHECK_HEADERS, so it uses .check_header() semantics. And this
> was the result of a long transition, because the compile test was
> ultimately deemed to be better. So in general, I would be wary about
> moving away from .check_header() toward .has_header(). But it looks
> like meson.build mixes those without much of a pattern, so maybe it
> doesn't matter for now.

I don't mind moving in that direction, but I do want the two sides to
match. So if it was good enough up to this point to use has_header()
for our feature macros, I don't think I want to try to change that for
18.

> But I'm also suspicious, because by this explanation, the
> AC_CHECK_HEADERS calls on sys/event.h should fail on OpenBSD, but they
> do not on the existing buildfarm members.

I think Andres tracked that discrepancy down [1]:

> Gah, configure does pass - because AC_CHECK_HEADER(), if includes is not passed
> in, first includes what's defined in AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT.

Thanks!
--Jacob

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/637haqqyhg2wlz7q6wq25m2qupe67g7f2uupngzui64zypy4x2%40ysr2xnmynmu4

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2025-06-24 20:43:14 Re: [PATCH] Fix OAuth feature detection on OpenBSD+Meson
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2025-06-24 20:33:31 Re: like pg_shmem_allocations, but fine-grained for DSM registry ?