On Tue, Sep 1, 2026 at 7:43 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> I remember that whole thing with pycryptodomex being confusing.
(While it's way outside the scope of this thread: if there aren't any
specific reasons to remain on `pycryptodome` as opposed to something
OpenSSL-backed like `cryptography`, it's probably overdue for a port.)
--Jacob