From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Paul Ohlhauser <bendix(dot)ohlhauser(at)gmail(dot)com>, postgresql(dot)cache976(at)passmail(dot)net, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PG19-3 PATCH] Don't ignore passfile |
Date: | 2025-09-08 18:29:22 |
Message-ID: | CAOYmi+k=7qOgczS_=CTbQAFJKDeju=kgnFrYd+HM-X0x+ROLnA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 10:46 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Changing the warning to an error wouldn't bother me a great deal, but
> > we'd probably need more than just you voting for that alternative to
> > justify overturning longstanding behavior.
>
> Agreed.
I think I'm starting to lean in the direction of "error rather than
warning", personally... Not a real vote yet; I'm not sure I understand
the compatibility fallout. Like, who would be angry if we did that?
No opinion on group read. But we should absolutely clarify the warning message.
--Jacob
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Melanie Plageman | 2025-09-08 18:32:29 | Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce WAL (and eventually set VM on-access) |
Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-09-08 18:24:32 | Re: GetNamedLWLockTranche crashes on Windows in normal backend |