Re: ci: namespace ccache by PostgreSQL major version

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ci: namespace ccache by PostgreSQL major version
Date: 2026-07-17 16:12:24
Message-ID: CAOYmi+==PhLLypJ13jwS9AR-Wevrv-C_C+Ppd5h_==iH9wYong@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 8:38 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> For cfbot it's kinda important to have *both* the master and branch specific
> caches for a run. Often, after a rebase of a branch to a newer master, the
> branch specific key will have a lower hit rate than during the last run, but
> master's cache applies to a lot of the part of the build not modified by the
> branch.

Oh, the rebase use case is interesting to think about. Thanks for the
explanation!

--Jacob

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2026-07-17 16:14:06 Re: ci: namespace ccache by PostgreSQL major version
Previous Message Andres Freund 2026-07-17 16:02:21 Re: Heads Up: cirrus-ci is shutting down June 1st