Re: DOCS - CREATE PUBLICATION wording re 'ONLY' for partitioned tables.

From: surya poondla <suryapoondla4(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Takeshi Ideriha <iderihatakeshi(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: DOCS - CREATE PUBLICATION wording re 'ONLY' for partitioned tables.
Date: 2026-10-27 20:16:10
Message-ID: CAOVWO5rwNntmKunVBfFWYnmRXdNQHCCAC95z_GuCeBw8+0i0xw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Peter,

Thanks for v4. Splitting the patch makes sense.

0001 looks good to me.

0002 also looks good to me. "For a partitioned table, ONLY and * have no
effect." is accurate for every ALTER PUBLICATION variant, and since
it no longer frames this in terms of adding, it addresses my concern
about DROP.

I agree the DROP TABLE p * behavior with explicitly-added partitions
is a separate question from this docs patch. If anyone wants to pursue it,
a separate thread is the right place.

Both patches apply cleanly on master.

Regards,
Surya Poondla

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Christensen 2026-10-27 20:22:47 Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL: the regroupening
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2026-10-27 20:06:28 Re: Be strict when request to flush past end of WAL in WaitXLogInsertionsToFinish